The goal of any regulatory policy should be to encourage economic growth, not to give the government money, not just to make a profit for any particular player. Your problem is herewith solved.

The depth of the political re-arrangement implied by open source politics is this. To the extent you accept open source, open networks and open spectrum you are progressive. To the extent you denounce them you are regressive.

It’s been a while since we played the 1966 Game. So let’s review the rules. The idea is that you look for modern analogs to the important players who made 1968 so memorable. But remember that this is something of a Bizarro World exercise. Now it’s the Republicans who are the insiders, the dominant Thesis […]

It will take time for truly-neutral networks -- muncipal, wireless, Google - to to come on-stream. But once they are there, and consumers see the difference between The Real Internet and the phony IMS variety the phone and cable opolists are pushing, the older companies will be well and truly dead.

Republicans may prefer to think it Reagan's legacy, but it was Nixon who built the beliefs that must be broken. The idea of the enemy. The enemies list. The media, the academics, the nay-sayers, sex, drugs, moral relativism. The idea that if we just kill enough of "them" then "we" will finally be "free."

In terms of raw political power, the "out" party is practically much closer to power than was the case 40 years ago.

My favorite news story this week is this one. The Macon Telegraph reports that a 45 foot tall American chestnut has been found, thriving, on Pine Mountain in FDR State Park, just a quarter-mile from one of the former President’s favorite fishing holes. As late as the 19th century a canopy of chestnuts, up to […]

You paid for the phone network, not them. You licensed the cable operators, and without your approval they would not, could not exist.

QoS will continue, regardless of the outcome of the network neutrality debate.

If you want real growth in wireless, the correct approach is to increase the supply of unlicensed spectrum. Cisco will make money, Microsoft will make money, and a host of new services will be created. New value will be created, and prices will be kept low.