• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home network neutrality

Visions of Net Neutrality: Ben Scott

by Dana Blankenhorn
April 4, 2006
in network neutrality
3
0
SHARES
5
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

From yesterday’s Freedom2Connect conference in Silver Spring, Maryland. (Watch this space for the rest of the conference as I get it copy edited.)


Ben Scott, policy director Free Press

Ben_scottWe have 230,000 members.  We do public education on communications policy issues. I lead the office here, which is an advocacy group on the Hill and before the FCC.

Before coming to Washington I was an academic. We debated issues as though they occurred in a vacuum. It’s our job to make sure people hear when decsions are being made, get mad, and do something about it.

We have a major education problem when it comes to the future of the Internet.

Network neutrality is an example. I’ve had 100 meetings on Capitol Hill in the last three months, on this issue. I sat down with a staffer recently and she said, "I don’t understand it, and I’m going to advise my boss stay as far from it as possible."

We have to get this issue a higher profile.

Two years ago communtiy broadband was hidden potential. Over the last two years 400 communities built them. The story got out – it was about choice. it captured the public imagination, local governments, venture capital, entrepreneurs, and we no longer hace a debate about whether there’s a local authority to provide it. The momentum has clearlly shifted.

It is incumbent on us to bring our knowledge outside the Beltway and tell that story for issues of network neutrality. It’’ only when we step outside, we realize people have no idea what we’’e talking about.

We need better ways to tell it as a story.

One is to discuss it in ways people understand. The question is not who controls the architecture, it’s who controls your consumer experience? Is it you or the network operator.

Compare it to things people already know. Network neutrality is about wehter the internet will become like cable television. we’re all expecting to reach any channel. By contrast, on cable the network operator decides what will be available. People understand and don’t want the Internet to become cable Tv. We’ve found this a successful way to get the issue across.

Why is the Internet free? It’s free because that’s the way it’s designed. The roads are that way.

Even though the rules were changed in 2005 with no one’s knowledge, that doesn’t change the fact we have common carriage on the network. It’s a good story.

I’ll close with a story from the community wireless summit. We had a roundtable discussion. The most gratifying moment came after the panel. The university that hosted us was taping us for their community access cable channel. The woman filming us came to me and asked, “How can I get involved?

It’s that moment we have to reproduce millions of times before we have a large enough group to do something.

Previous Post

Visions of Net Neutrality: Rick Ringel

Next Post

Visions of Neutrality: Brad Templeton

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post

Visions of Neutrality: Brad Templeton

Comments 3

  1. The Agonist says:
    20 years ago

    Net Neutrality Days-End Round-Up

    Just a brief round-up of net neutrality posts today, but not limited to having been posted today.
    Sanford at the San Antonio Express-News ATT blog notes Rep. Markey’s guest post, saying, “Markey lays out an easy-to-understand case for his side, and

    Reply
  2. Jesse Kopelman says:
    20 years ago

    I really like how Ben is presenting this issue. It is all about user experience and choice, not the economics of network construction and operation and some would try and paint it.

    Reply
  3. Jesse Kopelman says:
    20 years ago

    I really like how Ben is presenting this issue. It is all about user experience and choice, not the economics of network construction and operation and some would try and paint it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

End of the Cloud Era

Market Cap is Not Wealth

November 14, 2025
Suburban Poverty

Suburban Poverty

November 13, 2025
Intelligence Without Consciousness

Intelligence Without Consciousness

November 12, 2025
Why Masters of the AI Universe Lean Against What Works

What’s Killing the AI Boom

November 11, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved