• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home

When Will Google Fight?

by Dana Blankenhorn
July 6, 2006
in Broadband, Broadband Gap, Communications Policy, Competitive Broadband Fiber, Internet, investment, network neutrality, Web/Tech
0
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

John_sherman
Om Malik
writes today that the net neutrality fight is lost, and Google is just trying to drag it out by threatening to file an anti-trust action. (The man pictured is Sen. John Sherman, after whom our first anti-trust law is named.)

He’s wrong on two counts. First, the fight isn’t lost, because the bill was only approved by a committee and Democrats have decided to fight this one, hard, on the floor. They have the weapons to keep a bill from passing the Senate through the November election.

Second, anti-trust cases from private parties can be vital tools. (Ironically one of the more successful was filed by Caldera, the predecessor company to SCO, against Microsoft, concerning DR-DOS.)  Even before the case is won, it can tie up corporate actions for years.

But this is not what I mean by Google "fighting" against the duopolists seeking blackmail against them.

Fiber_cable
What I mean is for Google to unleash its dark fiber.

Don Dodge of Microsoft writes in his blog that Google purchased its dark fiber to mirror its index, and the Web, all over the world.  If this is true it means Google has a globe-girdling network.

I wrote over a year ago that, if Google has fiber in major U.S. cities (as I assume it does) then it really doesn’t need the Bell companies — not in terms of its own needs anyway.

But what it may need now is to break the Bell stranglehold on the last mile. And its dark fiber is the leverage that can do it.

Thanks to Moores Law of Fiber, also known as DWDM, or Dense Wavelength Division Multiplexing. What we’re talking about is colors. Instead of sending what looks like white light through a fiber, split the fiber into all the colors you can imagine and send each one separately. Each will have a separate wavelength, which can be detected by diodes. As the diodes improve (with Moore’s Law) so does the fiber’s capacity. Add in optical switching, and it means that any network with a fiber trunk can, with a big of finagling, handle all the traffic between those two points, thanks to the power of the rainbow.

Between its own fiber and 802.11 mesh technology, Google has the capacity (with enough business partners) of solving the last-mile problem, delivering new wireless capacity to every household that can grow with the 802.11 standards. It should then be lobbying to get more unlicensed bandwidth in order to increase those speeds, but (and here’s the good part) it really doesn’t have to risk a lot of cash.

Here’s how you do it:

  1. Register a few millions shares out of petty cash, and toss them into a joint-venture.
  2. Bring in Level 3 to run the fiber end of the venture, so between the two networks there’s plenty of capacity.
  3. Bring in Intel as a third investor, delivering the wireless technology in volume.
  4. Seek business partners in every city, village and town, who will work with its joint-venture on creating connectivity to all.

No, it won’t make a lot of profit. That’s why you want to spin this off. All the joint-venture needs to do is break even, and with equipment partners, technology partners, and local partners working together, it can be done. (Clearwire wants to compete? Great, the more the merrier.)

Even the threat of this will force the Bells and Cable operators to start releasing more  bits at lower prices, and on better terms, in order to hold the customers they’ve got.

If Google is really going to fight, and not posture, this is the way to do it.

Tags: 802.11broadbandbroadband gapDWDMGooglemesh networknetwork neutralityOm MalikVint CerfWi-Fi
Previous Post

Filibusters

Next Post

The 1966 Game: Who’s Wolfman Jack Now?

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post

The 1966 Game: Who's Wolfman Jack Now?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

Peter Steinberger’s Secret Sauce

Peter Steinberger’s Secret Sauce

February 17, 2026
What Will AI Become?

What Will AI Become?

February 16, 2026
The Dream Ride of a Lifetime

The Dream Ride of a Lifetime

February 15, 2026
How the Markets May Crash

How the Markets May Crash

February 13, 2026
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved