• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home

Monopolist or Competitor

by Dana Blankenhorn
December 10, 2007
in business models, business strategy, Communications Policy, e-commerce, investment
2
0
SHARES
12
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Carlos_slim
The difference between a monopolist and competitor is quite simple.

The monopolist cannot compete in a free market.

This is why I have always classed AT&T and Verizon as monopolists. They do not compCarlos_slim_moustacheete in free markets. They compete only in closed markets, markets with a very limited number of scaled competitors, high barriers to entry, where outrageous overhead and executive salaries are not just tolerated but encouraged. Every past effort by these companies to enter competitive markets, whether in computing or services or international, has failed.

The same is true for Carlos Slim, the Mexican monopolist whose Internet model, through TelMex, we have spent this decade importing. The Slim monopoly has done more than anything else to retard Mexico’s international competitiveness in this decade. The giant sucking sound which has lured Mexicans to America in droves, yet kept the country from competing in the manufacturing marketplace, owes a lot to Carlos Slim.

Here’s more proof, as if proof were needed. CompUSA, the computer retailer he bought just 7 years ago, is being dissolved.

Compusa_storefront
I have fond memories of this company from 20 years ago, when it opened
one of its earliest operations in Atlanta. Actually it was in Norcross,
on Jimmy Carter Blvd. Soft Warehouse was its name, and it offered
pallets of gear, as well as very smart people. It was a wonder. Prices
were half what they were elsewhere.

After it became CompUSA the good people disappeared. Even before Slim
bought the company it was just another computer retailer, just another
Fry’s wannabe, doing things half as well, with twice the overhead.

Slim drove it completely into the ground. He missed the opportunity in
services pursued by BestBuy and Circuit City. He missed the chance at
scaled savings offered by Fry’s. He missed the Internet. The company’s
offerings in all these areas were weak, second-rate.

Compusa_store_closings
"We made a mistake with management" was Slim’s excuse. But choosing
managers was Slim’s responsibility. The fact is he lacks the capability
of hiring people who can succeed in a competitive market. It is an
alien concept to him.

The fact that our telecom marketplace is becoming dominated by men like
Carlos Slim should be a great danger signal to our politicians and our
economy. But right now no one hears it.

Tags: AT&Tbusiness newsCarlos SlimcompetitionCompUSAcomputer retailingmonopolyretailretailingtelephone monopolyTelMexVerizon
Previous Post

W

Next Post

Chicken, Meet Egg in The War Against Oil

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post
Chicken, Meet Egg in The War Against Oil

Chicken, Meet Egg in The War Against Oil

Comments 2

  1. Thuktun says:
    18 years ago

    Assuming that it is correct that (1) monopolists cannot compete in free markets and (2) AT&T and Verizon cannot compete in free markets, it is a logical fallacy to claim that this implies AT&T and Verizon are monopolists.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent
    I’m not disagreeing with your other points, just noting something that jumped out at me.

    Reply
  2. Thuktun says:
    18 years ago

    Assuming that it is correct that (1) monopolists cannot compete in free markets and (2) AT&T and Verizon cannot compete in free markets, it is a logical fallacy to claim that this implies AT&T and Verizon are monopolists.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent
    I’m not disagreeing with your other points, just noting something that jumped out at me.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

How the Markets May Crash

How the Markets May Crash

February 13, 2026
The Unmet Promise of the Declaration

The Unmet Promise of the Declaration

February 12, 2026
AI’s Place in the Post-Industrial Revolution

AI’s Place in the Post-Industrial Revolution

February 11, 2026
E-Bikers Need a AAA

E-Bikers Need a AAA

February 10, 2026
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved