The media is telling sweet little lies about what happened in the Tuesday primaries and where we go from here.
The lies, briefly, are:
- The continuation of a nomination battle among Democrats is a big advantage for Republicans.
- Republicans are uniting behind John McCain.
- SuperDelegates have already been committed.
Why tell these lies? Mainly for dramatic effect. If people think November’s results are essentially baked-into the system, they might change the channel. And you can’t have them changing the channel. (Note: Change the Channel. Anything is better than Chris Matthews.)
So let’s fisk these lies quickly and easily:
- The Democratic struggle is about personality, not policy. The
vast majority of Democrats, and those who lean Democratic, will be
happy with either Clinton or Obama. Maintaining dramatic tension gives
both a ton of free media coverage so neither can be "blacked out" and
hammered by the Republican money machine over the next several months.
That was the insider worry about John Edwards, and Clinton can
apparently use the free pub. - The Republican struggle is about policy, not personality.
Conservatives aren’t hating on McCain because they think he’s a nasty
little man. They’re hating on him because they disagree with him.
McCain’s wins came mainly in blue states. He lost Tuesday to Huckabee
in the South and Romney in the West. A ton of conservatives are coming
out and saying they’d rather have a Democrat in November than ol’ John
McCain. How many Democrats are saying that about either of their candidates? - SuperDelegates, unlike regular delegates, are allowed to lie.
That is, elected delegates are committed on the first ballot. If you’re
elected as an Obama delegate, you vote for Obama, even if it turns out
he’s a crook.
But if you’re a SuperDelegate you’re a politician, so lie all you want.
Tell Clinton you’re in her corner until the last minute, then stick a
shiv in her. It’s fun. Same with Obama.
The truth is a 3-2 Democratic electoral majority has been baked into
the system by the events of the last few years. Katrina, Iraq, the
recession, the deficit — they’re not going away. And McCain, as well
as the other Republican candidates, supported the policies which led us
here, and endorse continuing those policies.
Howard Dean sent an e-mail to the troops yesterday predicting McCain
will be the nominee, and working to define him now as a Bush lackey.
Republicans did something similar to John Kerry in 2004, and to Al Gore
in 2000. It’s how you play the game. It has the advantage, in this
case, of being true.
McCain is an attempt by the Republican establishment to run away from
its complicity in the crimes of Bush and Cheney. McCain ran strongest
in blue states, based on a thin tissue of disagreements with the
Administration, most of which he swallowed hard on during the Second
Bush Term. It won’t work. American’s aren’t stupid.
But the media wants an exciting, down to the wire story that they can
control. One result is that we’re slowly turning away from the media.
We don’t like Chris Matthews. We don’t like Wolf Blitzer. We don’t like
Fox. We don’t like the New York Times or the Washington Post. We do not
like them, Sam I Am. Nor should we. Their Village Idiot nonsense
enabled all this death and destruction. They pulled down the temple on
their own heads and now they’re standing next to the rubble acting
innocent. They’re not.
Waking up from the media’s big lies may be the most important thing
which happens this year. The next Administration will be able to dine
out on our hatred of the media for years, just as the Nixon
Administration dined out on our hatred of the "liberal" media 40 years
ago.
How about Obama-Dean 2008?
Well you might be right about Democrats being fine with Clinton or Obama, but that is certainly not the case with independents. I think most of us feel about Clinton the way that the neo-cons and fundies feel about McCain. Meanwhile, these Republicans who claim they’d rather have a Democrat than McCain are certainly not talking about Clinton and I really doubt they are talking about Obama either — maybe they think Lieberman is running? Clinton is McCain’s dream match up and the very reason he carried Bush’s jock the last 8 years. He knows he has a decent shot of splitting the independent vote with her in the general election and that plus the Republican base might just be enough to win. To spout hyperbolic, a vote for Clinton now is a vote for McCain in November! On the other hand, no Republican has a chance against Obama. I don’t understand why these “I don’t care who wins as long as its a Democrat” people can’t see that.
Well you might be right about Democrats being fine with Clinton or Obama, but that is certainly not the case with independents. I think most of us feel about Clinton the way that the neo-cons and fundies feel about McCain. Meanwhile, these Republicans who claim they’d rather have a Democrat than McCain are certainly not talking about Clinton and I really doubt they are talking about Obama either — maybe they think Lieberman is running? Clinton is McCain’s dream match up and the very reason he carried Bush’s jock the last 8 years. He knows he has a decent shot of splitting the independent vote with her in the general election and that plus the Republican base might just be enough to win. To spout hyperbolic, a vote for Clinton now is a vote for McCain in November! On the other hand, no Republican has a chance against Obama. I don’t understand why these “I don’t care who wins as long as its a Democrat” people can’t see that.
I have yet to meet anyone who supports Clinton who would not also support Obama. But I know lots of people, including myself, who would vote for Obama but *not* Clinton.
I don’t think that even McCain can beat Clinton, but I know that he would be destroyed by Obama. Obama’s campaign would also have long coattails sweeping in many new Democratic representatives and Senators.
As for Obama-Dean . . . I doubt it. My guess would be Obama-Richardson.
I have yet to meet anyone who supports Clinton who would not also support Obama. But I know lots of people, including myself, who would vote for Obama but *not* Clinton.
I don’t think that even McCain can beat Clinton, but I know that he would be destroyed by Obama. Obama’s campaign would also have long coattails sweeping in many new Democratic representatives and Senators.
As for Obama-Dean . . . I doubt it. My guess would be Obama-Richardson.