Think of this as Volume 14, Number 16 of A-Clue.com, the online newsletter I've written since 1997. Enjoy.
The most important issue before the American people right now isn't Afghanistan. It's not the deficit. It's not health care.
It's civility. (This is the logo of the Civility Center, a non-profit run by Dr. Jay Newman of Michigan.)
Political and technology trends have combined over the last 40 years to make us a very uncivil people. The Nixon Thesis' adoption of McCarthyism, of thinly disguised racism, and later of religious intolerance resulted in the Bush Excess, a time during which Republicans decided they could make up their own reality.
That Excess is still alive in the Tea Party, whose signs, abuse of public figures and threats of violence are all direct attacks on the American experiment. History will prove that their incivility makes them traitors. It will bury them as it did the hippies before them.
I first saw this trend, online, in 1988, when I entered some Usenet discussions concerning politics through the old GEnie service. The level of vitriol, of insult, and sheer incivility I experienced there stayed with me.
It's easy to insult someone online. It's easy to call them names when you don't know them, when they're not standing in front of you. It's easy to ignore any moves toward compromise, or apology. It's easy to dehumanize.
It is in dehumanizing others that we dehumanize ourselves. The Web makes it easy. Some artists, reading that sentence, are already, right now, getting ready to flame me again, because I made a mistake with a piece of art and they have no intention of accepting any apology, explanation, or suggestion aimed at prevention.
I can't do anything about that except pity them.
Ever since the Web was spun, this easy dehumanization has been rising, spreading into other media, and seeping into our souls. Even the souls of our young people. Unlike a piece of art, the lives of victims like Alexis Pilkington can't be brought back. Cyberbullying easily turns into the real thing, as the case of Phoebe Prince demonstrates.
The same thing holds true in our political life, and in this case civility truly is a partisan issue. Republican leaders and media celebrities have chosen to ignore, deflect or reject every instance of threatened — and actual — right-wing violence over the last year.
Blood is on their hands.
It's true that under the First Amendment you can say what you want. But you still must take responsibility. In my own case, I'm going to lose about one-third of my income because I stole a bit of art work and then tried to defend it in the face of cyberattacks from what I considered a lynch mob. I happen to think, in retrospect, that the result is fair, and had the punishment been more public that, too, would have been fair.
But the cyberbullies stirred up (with malice aforethought) by artist Chris Buzelli also need to look within their own hearts. There is no case law showing that use of a thumbnail in a blog post, with credit, is theft. Their cries were lies. I gradually came to understand the nature of their rage, but rage must not be our default position as American citizens.
(Picture from a course page at the University of Maryland.)
The whole American experiment is aimed at maintaining civil discourse, without which democracy becomes impossible. We must learn to disagree without becoming disagreeable, and without losing sight of the other side's humanity, no matter our differences, or we're not really Americans. We're just pretending we are.
I'm not asking for perfection here. And I'm certainly not claiming to be without sin myself. But what we used to call netiquette is routinely ignored online, and that hurts efforts to find common ground on any issue.
The chief claim of the Tea Party is that the Constitution means what they claim it means. This has never been the case. The Constitution is a legal document, subject to judicial interpretation, and judges are supposed to be chosen for their diligence — they're not legislators. Screaming about secession, or organizing militias against legitimate government authority — that's crazy talk. It's un-American.
All this is enabled in the media by a false equivalence that makes the reporting of Rachel Maddow into the same thing as the psychotic ramblings of Glenn Beck, when seen from CNN. Uh, no. Maddow doesn't make shit up. Maddow doesn't preach sedition or call herself a "rodeo clown."
At the heart of the cyclical nature of American politics is the idea that, in time, any set of myths, values and assumptions will step into a trap of their own making. This is the Nixon Thesis' trap, one Republicans have stepped into with both feet. Angry rhetoric spurs incivility, incivility spurs dehumanization, and dehumanization inevitably leads to violence.
As the economy recovers — and it is recovering — those conservatives who now have blood on their hands will find it does not wash off. Democrats must not let them off the hook. We are the Silent Majority now, and our cry must be that you speak civilly, speak respectfully, or you won't deserve a hearing. You demanded we salute George W. Bush — you salute Barack Hussein Obama.
Anyone who would resort to violence in defiance of this rule is a murderer and traitor.
Dana, I attempted to politely show you, on the SmartPlanet site, how grossly wrong you were and are—in your lack of understanding about the law, and in your attitude. But there is no teaching a willfully ignorant, pigheaded, bloviating gasbag.
Your continued clinging to a gross misreading of the case law is not merely smug and offensive, though it is certainly that. It amounts to an arrogant belief that you are above the law, which does not permit you—a non-search engine—to freely use work you have not licensed.
One is tempted to go further and show how your arrogant, misplaced, and frankly illegal sense of entitlement is connected to the same arrogance that is exhibited by the political figures and positions you endorse—for there is certainly a connection. But that is not necessary. It is enough to observe that anyone who (unlike yourself) actually understands the law as it relates to copyright would be well advised to consider whom you look to as political allies, and—with the example of your own poor understanding before them—adjust their sympathies accordingly
Dana, I attempted to politely show you, on the SmartPlanet site, how grossly wrong you were and are—in your lack of understanding about the law, and in your attitude. But there is no teaching a willfully ignorant, pigheaded, bloviating gasbag.
Your continued clinging to a gross misreading of the case law is not merely smug and offensive, though it is certainly that. It amounts to an arrogant belief that you are above the law, which does not permit you—a non-search engine—to freely use work you have not licensed.
One is tempted to go further and show how your arrogant, misplaced, and frankly illegal sense of entitlement is connected to the same arrogance that is exhibited by the political figures and positions you endorse—for there is certainly a connection. But that is not necessary. It is enough to observe that anyone who (unlike yourself) actually understands the law as it relates to copyright would be well advised to consider whom you look to as political allies, and—with the example of your own poor understanding before them—adjust their sympathies accordingly
Right now there are two sorts of people with civility engrained into them: the oldest of the old folks, which the media routinely call “pre-Boomers” (i.e. the Silent majority!) and the youngest of the young. Whose GenX parents are instilling it into them with a heavy hand, leading to the amusing, amazing phenomenon of Grandma getting a thank-you note from a five-year-old but not from his 40-something parents!
Unfortunately, neither cohort has any power or authority in the public arena any more (or yet), meaning that civility will be at an ebb, just as any value held by those at both ends of the age scale will be at an ebb.
Pat, born 1939 and still trying to fight the good fight, when I’m not being patted on the head, ignored, or flatly told by one partisan or the other that it is their bounded duty to fight the Satanic Other Side by slinging verbal mudballs at them. (True incident. Happened on the Fourth Turning website.)
Right now there are two sorts of people with civility engrained into them: the oldest of the old folks, which the media routinely call “pre-Boomers” (i.e. the Silent majority!) and the youngest of the young. Whose GenX parents are instilling it into them with a heavy hand, leading to the amusing, amazing phenomenon of Grandma getting a thank-you note from a five-year-old but not from his 40-something parents!
Unfortunately, neither cohort has any power or authority in the public arena any more (or yet), meaning that civility will be at an ebb, just as any value held by those at both ends of the age scale will be at an ebb.
Pat, born 1939 and still trying to fight the good fight, when I’m not being patted on the head, ignored, or flatly told by one partisan or the other that it is their bounded duty to fight the Satanic Other Side by slinging verbal mudballs at them. (True incident. Happened on the Fourth Turning website.)
And there we go again: Dana living out his fantasies. Of course Dana. Everyone who doesn’t agree with you politically must be a vile racist. Sure….
How many more of these blogs do you feel you need to write? It seems to me you’re filled with hate against conservatives / libertarians / Christians / small-government-proponents / lower-tax propoents.
How many more before your mind is at ease?
And there we go again: Dana living out his fantasies. Of course Dana. Everyone who doesn’t agree with you politically must be a vile racist. Sure….
How many more of these blogs do you feel you need to write? It seems to me you’re filled with hate against conservatives / libertarians / Christians / small-government-proponents / lower-tax propoents.
How many more before your mind is at ease?