Think of this as Volume 16, Number 40 of A-Clue.com, the online newsletter I've written since 1997. Enjoy.
Sure, Mitt Romney is a dick.
He's stiff, he's blind to the real
world he never lived in, he has very little empathy for anyone
outside his Mormon social circle. He spouts a Randian social gospel
that's not from the Gilded Age, but from the Middle Ages.
But he's still the best candidate the
Republicans had this year, and that's a more important point.
Let's look at who ran. A perennial
candidate and radio talk show host whose only real experience lay in
running a pizza chain that made bad pizza. A social neanderthal who
lost his last statewide race by 20 points to a Democrat with all the
charisma of wallboard. A pompous ass, and Newt Gingrich. A governor
from a very big state who actually has no power and has shit for
brains. Did I miss anyone? (No, I already mentioned Bachmann.)
Do you think any of those estimables
could have run a better race than Willard the Rat? I don't. And if
you think about it you won't either.
So why was this the field? And why is
there still no real Republican bench? Chris Christie? Pleease. Rob
Portman? Who? Sarah Palin? Really? George “Macaca” Allen, who's
busy losing the race for his old Senate seat? Two ethnics who have
been in statewide politics a total of 5 years?
This has happened before.
Democrats
looked around in 1972 and found dwarves running for their nomination.
Alf Landon had to be practically pushed into the 1936 GOP nomination.
William J. Bryan was a re-run in 1900. George McClellan.
It's what was happening below these
nominees that was more important, and more determinative of the final
result. These parties were collapsing for a common reason. The myths
and values that had held them in power for a generation had crumbled
beneath their feet, had become obsolete, and no longer answered the
concerns of a new generation.
Mitt Romney's Republican Party has
created a caricature of the President they're running against. He's
George McGovern, elected because he was nothing more than a “magic
negro” of the type Sidney Poitier played, and no more substantial.
It's similar to the story McGovern told about Nixon, that he was a
combination of Herbert Hoover and Joe McCarthy. In both cases, the
base of each party internalized the incumbent as a grave threat to
the Republic, as evil incarnate, and thought their way to victory led
by simply defining him as they saw him, not running against a real
person but who they imagined him to be.
The key to all this is George W. Bush.
Not the President, but the man.
For years Democrats acted as
though Bush were an aberration, a uniquely unqualified fool who was
totally overmatched by the task before them. He wasn't. He was, in
fact, very typical of a late Nixon-era Republican, in that he had a
fixed set of beliefs that should work in every circumstance, and when
they didn't work all he could do was state them more loudly, or using
different words, maybe shorter words.
When you grow up with one set of
beliefs all your life, and those beliefs stop working because the
times have changed, because the beliefs can't speak to the challenges of a
new time, it's disorienting. Liberals felt this way in the Nixon
Administration, and Republicans felt the same way under Roosevelt. It can
make you crazy. Sometimes literally crazy, usually just politically
crazy.
Mitt Romney was the best his party
could do in 2012. He was a true believer in the ideology of his
party, an ideology that was birthed under Nixon, reached its peak
under Reagan, and fell apart under Bush. That ideology always had
layers to it – the religious layer, the Austrian economics and
Randian social theory layers, the neoconservative foreign policy
layer. Each represented a wing of the party, a self-reinforcing iron
triangle that over time hardened from a set of principles into an
ideology.
Just like communism.
So the Obama Thesis of Consensus speaks
to our time. It will speak to our children for some time to come. But
there will come a day, probably long after I've passed, where it will
not know what to say to some future time.
And then something else will come
along. Something always does. The fact that something new always
comes along is the genius of America. We're free to come up with
stuff like that, free to imagine new ideologies that work for our
times. We're free to adapt to change, and free to reject what won't
change.
But for now, for this liberal, it's
happy endings all around. I just know that there is no such thing as
“ever after.” There is only today, only our time.
