
I have been dealing with online trolls for 30 years and when I confront one now I always ask the same question, whether they understand the difference between the ordered liberty of the Constitution and the mere license of “I want what I want,” the essential role of government in guaranteeing that liberty is extended to all.
Sure, the Declaration of Independence held the rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness to be self-evident, but it went immediately to how those rights were to be established:
Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

It’s almost enough to make you swear off libertarianism.
Every online community I have ever been in has run afoul of trolls, who insist that their “First Amendment Rights” triumph over everything, including others’ First Amendment Rights. What happened at Reddit has happened at dozens of other sites over the years. The trolls drive out intelligent discourse, destroy the community, and then move on like a plague of locusts.

Online trolls see a growing field with active discussion, then swoop in with their anger and their misogyny, their racism and their unity of purpose in the face of civility. It doesn’t matter whether the subject is politics or finance, sports or gaming. You take them on and it’s “The Argument Clinic,” you protest and they’ll scream about “Free Speech,” you try to organize against them and it becomes personal. If you’re female this carries a real threat, and I think this is the whole point. Trolls are, in the end, nothing but bullies.

He is, in fact, merely the latest incarnation of something that has driven many states down over the last six years. Whether you’re talking about Wisconsin, Maine, North Carolina, or Texas, the politics of trolling gives license to its friends and rains destruction on its foes. Women are subject to being driven into slavery by their rapists, labor unions are systematically destroyed, voting rights are trampled and the environment destroyed for short-term profit and the insane fun of it.

If Democrats are engaged in creeping socialism, as Republicans contend, there can no longer be doubt that what too many Republicans have engaged in over the last 6 years is creeping Hitlerism.
It’s clear where all this leads. It leads to Latin America. It leads to Africa. It leads to the death of civil society. When civil society is fighting for its very existence against a foe that is engaged in trolling, the choices of voters narrow, because civil society itself is necessarily diverse, unable to hold nations to any single course. Force the majority to choose and you get internecine squabbling, which makes the unity trolls offer seem attractive, especially to military and industrial trolls for whom top-down “leadership” makes for a comfortable lifestyle choice.

ISIS is the product of Wahhabism, itself an extreme reaction to the extreme environment of Arabia. Its strictures on diet, on dress, and on behavior were necessary 300 years ago, when to live “outside the tent” of society literally meant a quick death. Arabia’s acquisition of enormous wealth under the Saudi Kings, in the last century, created a dynamic tension which the Saudis answered through a policy of “freedom for me but not for thee, ” in other words trolling. Members of the Saudi elite need never work, they can travel and have their hearts’ desires satisfied, so long as they return and follow the old strictures to the letter, at least in the public square.
Hypocrisy! Base hypocrisy! So said, first, Osama Bin Laden, a son of one of the Kingdom’s biggest industrialists. So, too, said his followers, and death to America! Death to Israel! Isn’t that what Wahhabism demands, ultimately? Why yes, it does. When, in the wake of 9-11, Bin Laden and his leadership were hunted to their deaths, ISIS moved in to fill the vacuum. Its leaders had no connection to the money, even if they took their funding from it. They meant to be the spear that would impose Wahhabism – pure, eternal – upon the entire world. A crusade for the prophet! You know, like Oliver Cromwell and Cotton Mather.

It is, in the end, madness. But it’s what happens when civil society is thwarted by the need for order, and it is what happens when trolling seeks absolute power in its own name. Is there really any difference, this troll asks, between destroying Palmyra and the U.S. in Vietnam destroying villages in order to save them? Or is that, merely a continuum, with what the Wahhabist demands being merely another, more moral choice?
It’s fun to watch America’s Social Conservatives try to deal with ISIS, because for guys like Mike Huckabee and Bill Donohue, Pat Robertson and the Duck Dynasty crowd, it’s like looking at themselves in a funhouse mirror. ISIS is their own wish fulfillment fantasy made real, even if their trolling is aimed at merely destroying “secular” values in exchange for “Christian” ones.

For the troll, who believes ultimately only in their own “freedom,” their own license, their own “right” to control others and dictate how the world should be, ISIS is the ultimate expression of what they’re about. Many in America can’t see that because their own view of their “freedom,” and the “oppression of others” needed to obtain it, results in a different world than that of ISIS. But it’s the same world, a world destroyed, a medieval world subject only to God’s wrath. We have met the enemy and he is us.
God is the ultimate troll. Or she can be, when we ignore her will, which you will find by opening any science textbook, paying particular attention to the section on Climate Science.








That…was powerful.
That…was powerful.
I see an over weight over age left winger speaking about trolls. You voted for a mongrel and now object to statesmen like Nixon and achievers like Trump. You of course must be an achiever to stand in judgement of your betters.To mention Christian and muslims values in the same context shows your bias and ignorance.
I see an over weight over age left winger speaking about trolls. You voted for a mongrel and now object to statesmen like Nixon and achievers like Trump. You of course must be an achiever to stand in judgement of your betters.To mention Christian and muslims values in the same context shows your bias and ignorance.
That’s funny and ironic, Ken Shane. Did you write that just to illustrate the argument made in Dana’s blog, or are you really a bad-ass troll?
That’s funny and ironic, Ken Shane. Did you write that just to illustrate the argument made in Dana’s blog, or are you really a bad-ass troll?