• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home A-Clue

Resources and the New Era: What the Best Futurists Got Wrong

by Dana Blankenhorn
December 31, 2020
in A-Clue, business models, business strategy, Current Affairs, economics, economy, energy, environment, Full Reset, futurism, innovation, investment, solar energy, The 1981 Game, The 2020s and Beyond, The War Against Oil, wind power
0
0
SHARES
7
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Green earthThis coming year represents the start of a new era.

It’s an era defined by technology, as much as the previous era was defined by resources.

I’ve written here many times that the gating factor for technology is human capital. The more trained, empowered, and willing human minds you can bring to bear, the more you can grow. Contrast this to the resource era, where the key to growth was control, over the land and what lay on or beneath it.

The politics of 2020 were defined by the clash of these two economies. It was expressed throughout the culture. But the market made its verdict clear, and it was a true landslide.


Allen_SteeleOracle, a second-rate cloud power, is now worth more than Exxon Mobil, America’s largest oil company. The five American cloud czars – Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Google, and Facebook – who used cash flow to build and maintain cloud data centers that are the infrastructure of the new economy, are now worth over $6 trillion. I for one welcome our new technology overlords.

What I learned in 2020 was to trust economic verdicts more than anything pundits, politicians, or even voters may say. America remains defined by the Golden Rule. He who has the gold makes the rules.

We’re going to discuss the implications of all this, and what comes next, in the coming weeks. But first I want to talk a little about what the best futurists got wrong. I’m not talking about analysts here, but writers. Great writers like Allen Steele and the collaborators Daniel Abraham and Ty Franck, who write as James S. A. Corey.

Steele and Corey got a lot right, but they got one important thing wrong. They defined the future as a search for resources. In Corey’s The Expanse, asteroids are being mined for precious metals and water. In Steele’s space novels, and in his ocean-going Oceanspace, the incentive for exploration is also to gain control of resources.

James s.a. coreyBut in the tech era, at least so far, resources are not as finite as they seemed to be when these works were written. Oil and gas seem to be everywhere. Tech companies can substitute for lithium in batteries. If resources were so finite, we’d be recycling more, but in 2020 we generated more trash than ever. PPE, paper, plastic bags, eating utensils, and boxes for our Amazon deliveries. Recycling remains a great unmet need because the market for recycled materials is so poor.

The Trump era will go down in history as a revolt against the new economics. As the Luddites invaded factories and broke machines to protect hand labor, Trumpites tried to protect oil and lumbering jobs at the expense of tech, weaponizing the Internet on behalf of a foreign resource holder, Vladimir Putin. The regions I have called Trumpistan are resource economies. The urban centers I have called Techlandia are research and software economies.

Elon muskThese changes accelerated under the COVID pandemic and won’t be put back into the bottle. Millions will continue to work from home. Silicon Valley will no longer be confined to San Francisco, Boston, New York, and Seattle. It will be everywhere. Over time, economics will triumph over politics, creating a new alignment of forces.

Steele’s novels predicted we’d be exploring space by now. We’re not doing it yet because space still lacks a business model. Tourism isn’t a compelling business model. Mining isn’t a compelling business model. Most science can be done on the ground.

What Steele got right was that billionaires would lead the charge. Elon Musk could be a character from a Steele novel. But space will remain a financial sink until it can generate revenue. Starlink, a communications network consisting of thousands of satellites in low orbit, promises to deliver broadband everywhere in the world, as Motorola’s Iridium failed to do 30 years ago.  Iridium is proof you can lose as much money being early to a market as being late.

AbundanceMeanwhile, prepare for an economics of abundance. Today, solar and wind are the cheap energy. They keep getting cheaper and will soon be cheaper than even natural gas. This will be true even when accounting for the existing infrastructure of gas, which still must be constructed to support renewables. Utilities that can harness this abundance and deliver it for transportation will be good investments through the decade.

The problem is that the business of solar and wind will remain tough. The model here is that of the computer hardware business, where margins were continually crushed over time. We’re going to play the 1981 game, when the IBM PC moved computing from white-shirted salesmen to storefronts. But as we know from that time, this was only the start of the PC’s evolution. Computing then moved to superstores like CompUSA, then to custom builds from Dell, then to consumer electronics stores like BestBuy, and eventually online, where you can now get what was once a supercomputer for $100 and a few clicks, and you don’t need any training to use it.

DeflationDeflation is a harsh taskmaster. That’s the lesson computing teaches renewable energy. It’s the key lesson for the economy. Costs keep going down, opening vast new avenues for exploiting human intelligence. East Asia and Africa are going to rise in this decade, as they never rose before. All they need to succeed is stable governance, acceptable to business and to creative people. It doesn’t have to be democratic, but democracy has proven to be far more flexible than autocracy, and flexibility is the key to competitiveness in the economics of abundance.

What we saw in 1969 and beyond is that political temperatures cooled gradually, as people moved away from agitation into building new lives around the new economic rules. It didn’t look like it at that time, and it doesn’t look like it now, with political agitation seemingly at a peak, everything defined by the red-blue divide. But that’s the trend.

The lesson of 2020, and of every past crisis, whether in 1968 or 1932, 1896 or 1860, is that politics makes the headlines, but economics drives the train. The economics of abundance will define the 2020s. The need for human capital, for trained, empowered, and motivated brains, will define the economy of your time.

You are the resource we have been looking for.

Tags: 2020salternative energydeflationeconomyenergy harvestingenvironmentinflationrenewable energysolar powerwind ower
Previous Post

The 2020 Blankenhorn Christmas Letter: Our Pandemic Year

Next Post

The Downside of Energy Abundance

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post
The Downside of Energy Abundance

The Downside of Energy Abundance

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

Reconsidering OpenAI

When Will the Bubble Burst?

December 12, 2025
Home

Becoming Opa Fiets In 2026

December 11, 2025
My Annual Christmas Letter

My Annual Christmas Letter

December 10, 2025
2026: America’s Political Deadlock is Broken

2026: America’s Political Deadlock is Broken

December 9, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved