• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home A-Clue

Cars Don’t Scale

But Electricity Does

by Dana Blankenhorn
April 22, 2024
in A-Clue, Business, business models, business strategy, Current Affairs, economics, economy, Electric Cars, energy, futurism, investment, News, Science, solar energy, Tech, The 2020s and Beyond, The War Against Oil, wind power
0
0
SHARES
69
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

I wouldn’t buy shares in Tesla right now.

I wouldn’t buy shares in any car company.

There are two reasons for this.

First, cars don’t scale.

It’s math. Every parking place is about 9 feet by 18 feet (3 meters by 6 if you’re in Europe.) That’s not even big enough for a lot of the trucks Detroit is making today. On the road, you need a lot more space than that. The average car carries fewer than 2 people. Most people drive alone.

The result is that, once the average building is over one story in height, city streets block up. Cars don’t scale for density.

As buildings get bigger, and cities grow denser, freeways stop scaling, too. Look at I-35 in Texas or I-95 through the eastern megalopolis. Do you know you’ll get from Atlanta to Boston faster driving I-81 to Scranton than I-95 through New Jersey?

We have known this for decades, but electricity offers a way out. Electric motors can be scaled to any size, from a wheelchair or scooter to a giant train. Gas engines don’t work with anything smaller than a motorcycle, or anything bigger than a semi-truck.

Before World War II, cities were designed around rails and density. The suburban model of distance and driving is a new one. It can be broken by giving each suburb a defined center and building density around that. Then you connect the suburbs with bike routes as car use declines. The cities of 2030 will look more like those of 1930 than those of 1980.

Electric Moore’s Law

There’s a second, equally important point, that analysts are ignoring.

The costs of Electric Vehicles (EVs) and their fuel.

As I’ve said before, electric motors are simple. It’s two electromagnets, one stationery and one moving. Electricity can drive the inner rotor and make a motor. Any other force turning the inner rotor can produce electricity, a generator. The technology is centuries old.

About 40% of an EV’s cost lies in the battery. Battery costs are declining, not just with mass production, but with new materials. Energy density is increasing, which means the weight needed to run an electric vehicle is declining. The improvement in productivity is estimated at 33% per year.

There’s a limit to this deflation, but that would be like advertising a limit to Moore’s Law in 1977. Deflation will continue. Simple machines and cheaper batteries mean that you will, by the end of the decade, see electric vehicles costing under $10,000.

The costs of battery fuel are also declining. Solar and wind energy now cost less than fossil fuel energy. We still haven’t adapted our electric infrastructure to this new abundance, but that work has begun. More storage, more small and interconnected grids, and more power are being produced closer to where it’s used. They’re all having a deflationary effect.

We’re commuting less, our driving distances are shortening, and we’re going to stores less often thanks to e-commerce. Total demand for travel is going down, just as the cost of that travel is going down.

I don’t care what kind of car you’re building. It’s bad news. It’s not going to get better. Sell your car stocks.

 

 

Tags: electric carsThe War Against Oilurban design
Previous Post

Why The Economy is Great

Next Post

The Two AI Markets

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post
The Two AI Markets

The Two AI Markets

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

Into the Freezer

Into the Freezer

January 23, 2026
The Stink is on OpenAI

The Stink is on OpenAI

January 22, 2026
The Death of Video

Netflix, Warner Brothers, And You

January 21, 2026
Lessons from New Jersey

Lessons from New Jersey

January 20, 2026
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved