• About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Dana Blankenhorn
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com
No Result
View All Result
Dana Blankenhorn
No Result
View All Result
Home A-Clue

Why Full Self Driving is a Fraud

Automated Driving and Automated Law Enforcement Go Hand in Hand

by Dana Blankenhorn
April 29, 2024
in A-Clue, AI, Business, futurism, innovation, investment, law, Tech, The 2020s and Beyond
0
0
SHARES
64
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Elon Musk insists he’s going to deliver Full Self-Driving, with help from China’s Baidu. The stock is rising as a result.

He won’t. He can’t. Although maybe Baidu can.

The reason should be clear to any American. While self-driving software can adapt to rational changes in the driving environment, it has a tough time with the irrational ones. American roads are full of them.

Speeding. Running red lights. Cutting across multiple lanes of traffic. Road rage. Jaywalking.

These are all violations of the traffic laws. But traffic laws are not enforced in the U.S. How can I say that? While 18-22 states allow red light or speeding cameras, 8-9 have laws explicitly outlawing them.

The only way to get people to uniformly obey traffic laws is to automate enforcement, in the same way self-driving purports to work, with cameras and software. Chinese governments, by contrast, brought in $47.1 billion from automated traffic fines in 2020. This has now been expanded to crack down on jaywalking.

Self-driving and automated law enforcement must go hand in hand for self-driving software to be practical. If you see red light cameras as “big brother,” intrusions on “your rights,” then you’ll never accept self-driving. It won’t happen.

The irony. The only way Musk can get what he wants is with an intrusive, automated, self-enforcing traffic system. As with Electric Vehicles (EVs) themselves, it’s the voters whose interests Musk opposes who are his natural supporters. And vice versa.

Investors take note.

Tags: Tesla
Previous Post

The AI Hangover

Next Post

Liberty vs. License

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn

Dana Blankenhorn began his career as a financial journalist in 1978, began covering technology in 1982, and the Internet in 1985. He started one of the first Internet daily newsletters, the Interactive Age Daily, in 1994. He recently retired from InvestorPlace and lives in Atlanta, GA, preparing for his next great adventure. He's a graduate of Rice University (1977) and Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism (MSJ 1978). He's a native of Massapequa, NY.

Next Post
Liberty vs. License

Liberty vs. License

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Post

Ask Not What AI Can Do to You

Ask Not What AI Can Do to You

December 4, 2025
Four Days a Week

Fire Andy Jassy

December 3, 2025
The Coming E-Bike War

An E-Moto Is Not An E-Bike

December 2, 2025

Defending the Netherlands

December 1, 2025
Subscribe to our mailing list to receives daily updates direct to your inbox!


Archives

Categories

Recent Comments

  • Dana Blankenhorn on The Death of Video
  • danablank on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • cipit88 on The Problem of the Moment (Is Not the Problem of the Moment)
  • danablank on What I Learned on my European Vacation
  • danablank on Boomer Roomers

I'm Dana Blankenhorn. I have covered the Internet as a reporter since 1983. I've been a professional business reporter since 1978, and a writer all my life.

  • Italian Trulli

Browse by Category

Newsletter


Powered by FeedBlitz
  • About
  • Archive
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Dana
  • Posts
  • Contact Dana
  • Archive
  • A-clue.com

© 2023 Dana Blankenhorn - All Rights Reserved